NHL Lockout: Bettman offers new deal & Canadian expansion rumours
Hallelujah! Gary Bettman and the owners, after previously advising they were not prepared to negotiate against themselves, have finally done something right. Realising their initials proposals were borderline offensive, Bettman and company have at last tabled a more reasonable offer.
While information is limited at this stage (although more detailed than I can be bothered researching into*), the very basics of the offer are something that all fans can get on board with: A 50/50 revenue split and a full 82-game season.
Obviously, we don’t want to get too excited at this stage, but at least there’s finally reason for cautious optimism. Having said that, you still wouldn’t put it past the NHL to screw things up.
Along those lines, it will be interesting to see how long the proposed deal is for. NHLPA executive director Donald Fehr has said it is for “at least six years.” However, with three lockouts since 1994, it would be good to see some much-needed labour harmony with a deal closer to 10 years.
Amazingly though, almost overshadowing this unexpected news is the stunning rumour that once a new CBA is agreed, deals for two new Canadian expansion teams will be announced in Quebec and Toronto.
On the surface at least, this is great news for the game, especially in Canada, with the league increasing to 32 teams and allowing for realignment to four eight-team divisions.
However, by delving a little deeper (i.e. actually thinking about it some more, admittedly a stretch for me), it doesn’t make quite so much sense. For example, are the Maple Leafs really going to accept having a new regional neighbour to compete against?
(They were bad enough about Howard Balsillie potentially moving the Phoenix Coyotes to Hamilton if he had been successful in purchasing the franchise. Although wouldn’t it be great imagining the panic as the Leafs realise they have to finally start putting a decent product on the ice. This could actually turn out to be a win-win scenario for long-suffering Toronto hockey fans.)
Also, while 32 teams puts the NHL on a par with the NFL (figuratively speaking anyway) and offers a better symmetry, with exactly half of the teams making the playoffs, isn’t there the small matter of the numerous teams currently losing money, hence one of the major reasons we are actually in a lockout in the first place?!?!
While this potential expansion is just a rumour at the moment, if true, doesn’t it show yet another example of the NHL’s inability to do right for doing wrong? Surely it makes more economic sense to stabilise the franchises that are currently struggling to survive, rather than add new teams.
Finally, given how uninspiring last season’s playoffs were, is it really such a good idea to further dilute the available talent? By all means place new teams in Quebec and Toronto, but surely relocation is the better move.
Anyway, let’s not get ahead of ourselves. First things first, lets see if the NHL can actually reach an agreemment before November 2nd, to ensure a full slate of games.
* Click here to read Manny’s take on the proposal, which goes into more detail than I did, thus showing which of us is the slacker.
- By paul.taylor
- October 16, 2012
- Comment